I don't know what sfgate is, but they should be embarrassed that they published this ... this ... umm, essay. The main points are 1) this is only a confirmation

I don't know what sfgate is, but they should be embarrassed that they published this ... this ... umm, essay. The main points are 1) this is only a confirmation of a theory, not a new observation, 2) this is about relativity, not quantum mechanics, and the two models are so far irreconcilable; and 3) "until reality is united into one whole, science cannot justify its claim to understand nature." In other words, the creationist "criticism" of science. And then a weird left turn into claiming that physics can't explain how we understand things, and therefore we don't have an accurate model of reality. Ridiculous from start to end.