4 ms·
I think you and I have argued about this before, but I've never understood why "verifiable" isn't the end of the criteria. If the accuracy of information is ver
by ubernostrum 11y ago
I think you and I have argued about this before, but I've never understood why "verifiable" isn't the end of the criteria. If the accuracy of information is verifiable through the referenced reliable sources, why should anyone care whether that information is "notable" or not?
- tptacek 11y agoWikipedia's definition of "notable" is simply "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". There isn't a lot of daylight between "notability" and "verifiability".
- ubernostrum 11y agoThen Wikipedia should get rid of "notability" as a criterion and simply insist on verifiable coverage in reliable sources.