3 ms·

It is also worth reading Apple's motion in this case: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2722199-5-15-MJ-00451-SP-USA-v-Black-Lexus-IS300.html https://www.

It is also worth reading Apple's motion in this case: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2722199-5-15-MJ-00451-SP-USA-v-Black-Lexus-IS300.html https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2722199-5-15-MJ-0045... Actually I just noticed something about the title of the case: USA vs Black Lexus IS300. Is this actually a criminal forfeiture case?

msbarnett 11y ago
That's a motion from a case in California. This ruling is from one in New York. It's confusing because the Goverment has advanced this All Writs theory in 9 different currently ongoing cases to try to get it to stick.
- chimeracoder 11y ago
  > It's confusing because the Goverment has advanced this All Writs theory in 9 different currently ongoing cases to try to get it to stick. The only one I've heard about is the San Bernardino shooter's phone. What are the other eight cases?
  - msbarnett 11y ago
    The New York case this ruling came out of is one of them. This list has all of the ones Apple listed in a filling in this New York case: http://appleinsider.com/articles/16/02/23/in-new-court-filing-apple-cites-9-other-cases-in-which-fbi-asserted-the-all-writs-act http://appleinsider.com/articles/16/02/23/in-new-court-filin...
caf 11y ago
It seems that applications for search warrants are also USA vs <property-to-be-searched> cases.