3 ms·

I find it confusing that you detached the thread that was actually commenting about the actual article, but then left the thread that was commenting about the <

I find it confusing that you detached the thread that was actually commenting about the actual article, but then left the thread that was commenting about the <now detached> comment's style. It would have made much more sense to leave @morley's original comment wondering if the actual post, "Is this just a fancy blog for engineering stories as a means of hiring more engineers?" and instead detached @hafling's comment about @morley's comment style.

dang 11y ago
That's exactly what we did! Why did it seem otherwise?
- metasean 11y ago
  You broke off (detached; are NOT showing) the comment that IS ACTUALLY RELATED to the original post. You left the comment that was commenting on the commenting style of the detached post. It seems like you detached the WRONG comment, hence my confusion.
  - dang 11y ago
    I'm pretty sure you're mistaken. We didn't touch the original, on-topic comment (11195956) at all. It's right where it always was. "Detached" means we disconnected a reply (11195956) from its original parent (11195956) and moved it to the top level instead. That moved all its child comments too. Then we marked the entire subthread offtopic, which moves it lower on the page.
    - metasean 11y ago
      Definitely 'caused confusion, in particular: A) @hafling's comment (11195956) now looks like it is directly referencing the parent discussion (therefore it's lost its context). B) Your comment about detaching it (11196963) references the comment it was detached from, BUT because a link to a sub-thread opens the linked sub-thread as a parent thread, it appears to be a brand-spanking new thread (if I haven't properly articulated this, click https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195895 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195895 and you'll get the idea) C) I don't see any indication that the offtopic sub-thread has been marked as offtopic. Combining these, B makes it look like the relevant conversation has been completely detached from the relevant conversation, while A and C makes it look like the off-topic conversation has been left, but it's now lost it's context. I absolutely agree, the sub-thread is off-topic. But the detachment result is just downright confusing! I'd rather there be a visible flag that a sub-thread is off-topic with a way to collapse the off-topic thread (something I'd love to see anyway for several other reasons), maybe even auto-collapse an off-topic thread (somewhat similarly to the way dead-threads default to not being shown, and when they are shown they are flagged as such). Just my thoughts after being really confused! (Kinda ironic, given my original comment on the sub-thread - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11196732 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11196732) @dang - Special thanks for helping me understand what was going on! edited: trying to make my statement slightly more clear

dang 11y ago

That's exactly what we did! Why did it seem otherwise?

metasean 11y ago
You broke off (detached; are NOT showing) the comment that IS ACTUALLY RELATED to the original post. You left the comment that was commenting on the commenting style of the detached post. It seems like you detached the WRONG comment, hence my confusion.
- dang 11y ago
  I'm pretty sure you're mistaken. We didn't touch the original, on-topic comment (11195956) at all. It's right where it always was. "Detached" means we disconnected a reply (11195956) from its original parent (11195956) and moved it to the top level instead. That moved all its child comments too. Then we marked the entire subthread offtopic, which moves it lower on the page.
  - metasean 11y ago
    Definitely 'caused confusion, in particular: A) @hafling's comment (11195956) now looks like it is directly referencing the parent discussion (therefore it's lost its context). B) Your comment about detaching it (11196963) references the comment it was detached from, BUT because a link to a sub-thread opens the linked sub-thread as a parent thread, it appears to be a brand-spanking new thread (if I haven't properly articulated this, click https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195895 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195895 and you'll get the idea) C) I don't see any indication that the offtopic sub-thread has been marked as offtopic. Combining these, B makes it look like the relevant conversation has been completely detached from the relevant conversation, while A and C makes it look like the off-topic conversation has been left, but it's now lost it's context. I absolutely agree, the sub-thread is off-topic. But the detachment result is just downright confusing! I'd rather there be a visible flag that a sub-thread is off-topic with a way to collapse the off-topic thread (something I'd love to see anyway for several other reasons), maybe even auto-collapse an off-topic thread (somewhat similarly to the way dead-threads default to not being shown, and when they are shown they are flagged as such). Just my thoughts after being really confused! (Kinda ironic, given my original comment on the sub-thread - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11196732 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11196732) @dang - Special thanks for helping me understand what was going on! edited: trying to make my statement slightly more clear