3 ms·
It must be a mathematician thing. When I am doing something that involves finding a smaller number, I expect to see a < operator. How would this look if you w
by justinsaccount 11y ago
It must be a mathematician thing. When I am doing something that involves finding a smaller number, I expect to see a < operator.
How would this look if you were writing code that dealt with something like a linked list where you have 'cur' and 'next' pointers? 'cur' would be 'next' and 'next would be 'nextNext' ?
- GFK_of_xmaspast 11y agoAs a mathematician, that code snippet seems perfectly fine?
- justinsaccount 11y agoI meant that as in, I am not a mathematician. When I am looking at code that is trying to find a smaller number I expect to see a < operator.