2 ms·
What I meant is: (0) Expand the templates at compile-time, in order to type-check the code. (1) Don't generate target language code for each specific instanti
by catnaroek 11y ago
What I meant is:
(0) Expand the templates at compile-time, in order to type-check the code.
(1) Don't generate target language code for each specific instantiation, though.
(2) Re-expand the templates (or some representation of them) at runtime.
It's a very silly implementation strategy, of course. But I don't see why it's fundamentally impossible to do this - it's just undesirable.
And, yes, I agree about generics being better.