The author says this: >If this sounds like advocacy for mediocrity, instead of merit, it is not. Keep in mind the following facts And then follows up with a b

The author says this: >If this sounds like advocacy for mediocrity, instead of merit, it is not. Keep in mind the following facts And then follows up with a bunch of excuses about how they are not measuring merit by any means because traditional presentations and different project timelines are to difficult to compare for merit. "it sounds like we don't want reward merit, and that's because we don't have the competence to measure it"