We already have a term for what he did, he broke the terms of service. That was clearly laid out in his comment. I don't think you added any new information t

We already have a term for what he did, he broke the terms of service. That was clearly laid out in his comment. I don't think you added any new information to it. I think you are getting down voted because he explained the entire situation, and you generalized it in a way that strips his actions of context. For instance if someone told me your were a thief, I would instantly form a poor opinion of you. However I would form a very different opinion if I knew the reason you were a thief was because you posted your bike on craigslist, and then broke the terms of service by re-posting those pictures elsewhere. Thus anyone who introduces you as a thief is doing you and communication a disservice.