I don't have a beef with the conclusion, but it should be noted that an 18-year-old study is ancient in comparison to all we have learned since (e.g. about reco

I don't have a beef with the conclusion, but it should be noted that an 18-year-old study is ancient in comparison to all we have learned since (e.g. about recovery, fuels, cellular adaptations, etc). A professional writer should be more current on research.