2 ms·
"Reiffel was approached by senior US Air Force officers in 1958, who asked him to 'fast-track' a project to investigate the visibility and effects of a nuclear
by bootload 11y ago
"Reiffel was approached by senior US Air Force officers in 1958, who asked him to 'fast-track' a project to investigate the visibility and effects of a nuclear explosion on the moon. "
Was the US Air Force capable of launching a missle to the moon in the late '50s, early '60's?
Lets say they chose the Atlas. Lets be generous and say the Atlas E was chosen (Lockheed , first launched in Feb 24, '61) [0] it was capable of an 820Kg payload into low orbit. The interesting bit, for the total life of this particular rocket there were "9 successful launches, 7 partial successful launches and 2 failures."
Hardly a reasonable plan to get a bomb to the moon. Nothing really happened until Wernher von Braun was put in charge of the F1 and by then the target was a manned mission.
[0] http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app3/b-2.html http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app3/b-2.html
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun#NASA_career https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun#NASA_career
- valarauca1 11y agoa project to investigate the visibility [...] of a nuclear explosion on the moon So the thought process was literally, "I wonder if we could see a nuclear explosion on the moon?"
- bootload 11y ago@valarauca1 good point, though I'm sure there was a good reason behind this. Did someone think this might be a one-up on Sputnik? Anyway I'm glad it didn't go through. The success rates for US Air Force rockets at that time wasn't good.