3 ms·
It goes to show that the poster idea >Agile ideologues -> just doesn't lead to working software it's a flawed idea; if you want to take agile core values all
by xlayn 11y ago
It goes to show that the poster idea
>Agile ideologues -> just doesn't lead to working software
it's a flawed idea; if you want to take agile core values all of them are focused on actually trying to reduce errors and improve quality [0].
On the other hand it's a very broad generalization, and leaves the open question "what does actually lead to working software?"
[0] http://www.agilemanifesto.org/ http://www.agilemanifesto.org/
- eponeponepon 11y agoOn a small point of order, I'm slightly worried that you might have read "idealogues" as a typo for "ideologies" - very much not the case! I very much meant idealogues. I don't take much issue with the underlying ideas of the Agile manifesto - it's the ritualisation and thoughtlessness that it can lead to that irks me. The "anti Agile manifesto", many though its faults are, rings true in a lot of places, to my mind: "backlogs are really just to do lists" seems pretty much inarguable, for one.