3 ms·
I don't think I get where your post is going. When I hear some combination of "getting it right" and "first time" I don't presume that the development team onl
by forgottenpass 11y ago
I don't think I get where your post is going. When I hear some combination of "getting it right" and "first time" I don't presume that the development team only gets one crack at something. Instead, it just sounds like iterating internally on something until it's ready without cutting corners.
- xlayn 11y agoIt goes to show that the poster idea >Agile ideologues -> just doesn't lead to working software it's a flawed idea; if you want to take agile core values all of them are focused on actually trying to reduce errors and improve quality [0]. On the other hand it's a very broad generalization, and leaves the open question "what does actually lead to working software?" [0] http://www.agilemanifesto.org/ http://www.agilemanifesto.org/
- eponeponepon 11y agoOn a small point of order, I'm slightly worried that you might have read "idealogues" as a typo for "ideologies" - very much not the case! I very much meant idealogues. I don't take much issue with the underlying ideas of the Agile manifesto - it's the ritualisation and thoughtlessness that it can lead to that irks me. The "anti Agile manifesto", many though its faults are, rings true in a lot of places, to my mind: "backlogs are really just to do lists" seems pretty much inarguable, for one.