> I would have every module an actor type. There can be multiple types each type has its own schema. Within an actor type many actors. Noted. > ActorDB has di

> I would have every module an actor type. There can be multiple types each type has its own schema. Within an actor type many actors. Noted. > ActorDB has distributed ACID transactions so I would use that. You can create a transaction over multiple actors. Sweet! In particular, the second sentence is exactly what I wanted to hear. I will give ActorDB a try.