3 ms·
I've always had a dissatisfied opinion about jQuery, I much preferred Mootools. When coffeescript turned up, it seemed to hop on the back of jQuery. Doing a lot
by Kequc 11y ago
I've always had a dissatisfied opinion about jQuery, I much preferred Mootools. When coffeescript turned up, it seemed to hop on the back of jQuery. Doing a lot of the things Mootools already did and leaving gaps where jQuery was king.
Now I use typescript and no libraries at all. It isn't too difficult to write a utility object that can handle whatever depreciations or abstractions are fluctuating.
If you are writing a library of any kind and expect your clients to install jQuery for the benefit I'd say you've added too much bloat.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- emehrkay 11y agoFunny how ES6 looks a lot like MooTools, it was ahead of its time