> damnum absque injuria Neat, but the definitions I found say that's "harm without a legal wrong" (such as reducing someone's income by opening a competing sho

> damnum absque injuria Neat, but the definitions I found say that's "harm without a legal wrong" (such as reducing someone's income by opening a competing shop). To my untrained eye, the Linux kernel issue seems to be a legal wrong without harm, as you say ...