5 ms·
Five years is a long time, a lot can happen in five years. I've made the mistake of not selling an asset fast enough, and that probably cost me $100k-150k (eas
by charlesdm 11y ago
Five years is a long time, a lot can happen in five years.
I've made the mistake of not selling an asset fast enough, and that probably cost me $100k-150k (easily!). What might look great today might not in two years.
3-4x does sound reasonable for something that is:
1. Illiquid
2. Taxed as income -> less favourably than capital gains on stocks
3. Requires work, every, single, day
> If I sold at 4x and then said, where can I put that money and get a nearly guaranteed 25% return, I don't think I could find that. That would be risky.
Your SaaS business might get hit with a multi million dollar lawsuit tomorrow and go bankrupt because of it - nothing is certain. But you can definitely get 15-20% returns with proper risk management when investing with your own money. And if structured properly, those gains are capital gains, meaning you pay (a lot) less tax.
- ryanwaggoner 11y agoBut you can definitely get 15-20% returns with proper risk management when investing with your own money. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Seriously, mind sharing some of your secrets for where you're finding these definite returns of 15-20% with proper risk management?
- charlesdm 11y agoAs a simple example: the average return of the S&P500 over the last five years has been 16%. 2010: 14,82% 2011: 2,10% 2012: 15,89% 2013: 32,15% 2014: 13,52% 2015: 1,36%
- exclusiv 11y agoGood points on the tax benefits, however the S&P historically is about 10% over the long haul. 16% over the past 5 years is irrelevant. I have no control in the S&P. I have control in my company. I'd rather rise or fail due to myself than say - the market did this. I max a 401k for tax purposes and do state muni-bonds for safe, decent tax-free monthly dividend income while I decide what current or new business of mine to invest the cash in. The market is basically tax-friendly gambling.
- ryanwaggoner 11y agoThat's six years, not five. And the annualized return (geometric mean, not mean) is 12.85%, not 16%. Worst of all, you picked a short outlier period to consider. If you instead look at the trailing ten years of Feb 2006 to Feb 2016, the annualized return is 6.3%, even with dividend reinvestment. And that's without accounting for inflation, making your real return closer to 4.5%. Bump up to look at the last 30 years and with dividend reinvestment and adjusting for inflation, you get about 7%. I think that's probably a realistic target to shoot for in the very long run (decades). Source: http://dqydj.net/sp-500-return-calculator/ http://dqydj.net/sp-500-return-calculator/
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]