4 ms·
> ...why hasn't this been accounted for in a new version of GPL? According to the article, it has been addressed in GPLv3.
by groovy2shoes 11y ago
> ...why hasn't this been accounted for in a new version of GPL?
According to the article, it has been addressed in GPLv3.
- m_mueller 11y ago.. which Torwalds AFAIK opposes, so no Linux kernel on GPLv3.
- dragonwriter 11y agoTorvalds couldn't move the kernel to GPLv3 if he wanted to. Every contribution under v2 without the "or later" clause would have to be relicensed by the contributor, first.