4 ms·
But I'm saying if you evaluate the axiom symbols two different ways, it's two different axioms.
by plutooo 11y ago
But I'm saying if you evaluate the axiom symbols two different ways, it's two different axioms.
- catnaroek 11y agoWhat you're saying is more or less equivalent to “two C implementations targeting different [architectures / operating systems / whatever] are actually implementations of two different programming languages”.
- plutooo 11y agoNo, I'm saying the meaning behind statements are different. On some architectures, an int is 16-bit, on others 32-bit. Anyway, this analogy was pushed too far a long time ago.
- catnaroek 11y agoAh, lovely! You just arrived exactly where I was trying to get. > I'm saying the meaning behind statements are different. Yes, exactly! And, just like a single C program can have two different meanings under two different implementations, the same axiomatic system can have two different meanings when deducing its consequences (proving theorems) using different rules of inference.