3 ms·
> There's no precedent for massive surveillance But there is precedent for just "surveillance". In your own words, there's precedent for murder - would I be fi
by scrollaway 11y ago
> There's no precedent for massive surveillance
But there is precedent for just "surveillance". In your own words, there's precedent for murder - would I be fine if I were the first "mass murderer"?
- matt_wulfeck 11y agoThat's a good point. I actually think that point would make a good argument in court.