4 ms·
HBD has been generally disregarded as bunk science. I have yet to see anything otherwise that isn't on some vaguely conspiratorial and mostly self-referential b
by knowaveragejoe 11y ago
HBD has been generally disregarded as bunk science. I have yet to see anything otherwise that isn't on some vaguely conspiratorial and mostly self-referential blog somewhere.
- is_it_worth_it_ 11y agoReally? Scientifically it has been proven over and over. It just isn't mainstream.
- zephharben 11y ago"Scientifically it has been proven ... It just isn't mainstream" - the presence of these words, in this precise sequential order, has been empirically demonstrated to indicate that the author is a crackpot.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- is_it_worth_it_ 11y agoThe whole tenant of evolution is that great effective genes are passed on and reflected in offspring. By arguing that there is no genetic difference you are arguing that IQ cannot be passed on and that different environments did not select for and need different levels of IQ. If you are arguing that, then you are denying evolution as a theory.
- tzs 11y agoWhat is HBD?
- tptacek 11y ago"Human biodiversity".
- whitegrape 11y agoThere are peer reviewed papers you know, with replication and everything. It's regarded as bunk science by the exact same kinds of people who say climate change science is bunk science: people who don't read the science papers.