4 ms·
On the Pi 2, the ethernet port was really a USB-to-ethernet port plugged into a hidden USB port. So network speeds were limited to USB 2 speeds. I'm guessing
by 2bitencryption 11y ago
On the Pi 2, the ethernet port was really a USB-to-ethernet port plugged into a hidden USB port. So network speeds were limited to USB 2 speeds. I'm guessing the Pi 3 also works like this, instead of having pure onboard ethernet? But I don't know yet.
- khedoros 11y agoIf it's using the same bcm2836 chip, then I think it'll have the same limitations. The markings on the chip in the pictures aren't quite legible enough to me, playing around in a photo editor, but it's marked the same way that the Pi2's chip is, from what I could see.
- morganvachon 11y ago> So network speeds were limited to USB 2 speeds Given that USB 2.0 is 480Mb/s, and Ethernet is 100Mb/s, there is no bottleneck when using the Pi's Ethernet port. I really wish this myth that "Pi Ethernet is slower than dialup because USB" would just die. Of course, like everyone else I'd love to see a new version of the Pi with Gigabit Ethernet directly connected to the system bus, and USB 3.0 while we're at it. But that would greatly increase the cost of the device and also require a newer SoC that supports such things.
- voltagex_ 11y ago>Pi Ethernet is slower than dialup because USB I can't find any info to say which bus the MMC reader is connected to, but I know if you use a USB drive as well as the built in ethernet port, speed will suffer.
- duskwuff 11y agoNone of them. The SD card connects directly to the CPU.
- Relys 11y agoWe can still dream can't we? I hope to see this in the future.
- random55643 11y agoI just want a 64bit one. I put in an order for a Pine 64.
- rasz_pl 11y agopee 3 will be 64bit :)
- random55643 11y agoWhat's a Pee 3? :)