the video compression patent is part of a standards package (if I remember right) and those have only minimal value. They have to be licensed to anyone on a "fa

the video compression patent is part of a standards package (if I remember right) and those have only minimal value. They have to be licensed to anyone on a "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" basis which means it's not that valuable. The slide-to-unlock was Apple's novelty and not part of a standard. Hence the claim that it was more valuable. Of course now that the patent's been invalidated it's worth zero. Not several millions.