3 ms·
In this case, its more prohibition of a critical component of the porn industry [ no condom shoots ] that was necessary for them to be economically viable.
by fweespeech 11y ago
In this case, its more prohibition of a critical component of the porn industry [ no condom shoots ] that was necessary for them to be economically viable.
- x0x0 11y agolots of industries are more "viable" (profitable) if you allow them to kill workers
- anigbrowl 11y agoThe industry doesn't willingly kill workers. The whole mandatory HIV testing routine was originated within the industry. I know quite a lot of sex workers and they don't appreciate this so-called 'help' from people outside the industry.
- fweespeech 11y agohttp://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/ http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/ > Using male condoms the right way, every time, can reduce (though not eliminate) the risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and viral hepatitis, as well as other diseases that may be transmitted through sex like Zika virus and Ebola. Using male condoms the right way, every time, can also help prevent pregnancy. The existing safeguards aren't 100% but condoms aren't 100% either. All you've really done by backing this is driving people to produce off the books and outside of the regulated area. All it did was add to their commute.