6 ms·

It sounds like a useful tactic would be to plaster your walls with art related to Disney/Marvel characters. This would make it a legal nightmare to film in wit

by beloch 11y ago

It sounds like a useful tactic would be to plaster your walls with art related to Disney/Marvel characters. This would make it a legal nightmare to film in without stripping the place bare.

rl3 11y ago
Even better, mix in some QR code posters with illegitimate links to Marvel/Disney content. If even one somehow slips by the video editing crew, you're talking legal apocalypse.
- anigbrowl 11y ago
  No you're not. Scienter would apply.
  - deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]
  - rl3 11y ago
    Sure, but it would still create a legal mess and/or a large headache.
    - ryanlol 11y ago
      No it wouldn't cause anything at all. Nobody sane would sue for that because they might as well be taking a pile of money and setting it on fire.
      - rl3 11y ago
        >Nobody sane would sue for that because they might as well be taking a pile of money and setting it on fire. In other words, basically what major copyright holders do every time they file lawsuits against P2P users en masse. Seems to me they're already adept at setting large piles of money on fire.
        pessimizer 11y ago
        They only file those suits to get addresses, and use them to send out letters asking for cash not to sue. They usually don't sue anyone, and make a fortune.
        rl3 11y ago
        >They usually don't sue anyone, and make a fortune. Such practices do not appear profitable.[0] Perhaps that's because the article is dated, but mass P2P lawsuits being unprofitable is congruent with their decline in recent years. [0] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/10/music-industry-exec-p2p-litigation-is-a-money-pit/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/10/music-industry-ex...
        ryanlol 11y ago
        Sorry, but what connection is there between the P2P lawsuits and suing someone from shooting porn in an apartment that just happens to have a barely readable QR code on the wall put there by someone else?
        rl3 11y ago
        You were suggesting major content holders are rational in regards to litigation. P2P lawsuits serve as a counterexample to that.
        ryanlol 11y ago
        Familiarize yourself with the bulk P2P lawsuits, they're doing everything in their power to cut costs.
        rl3 11y ago
        I'll get right on that, but first I have to bury this dead horse here.
Kristine1975 11y ago
>without stripping the place bare. Well they are shooting a porn movie, so why not try something new? It's boring if only the actresses/actors are stripping. "Hot poster action! Uncensored walls! Naughty wallpaper laid bare!" Or just pixelize. Japanese porn does it all the time. Maybe even automate the task: Use computer vision to detect copyrighted posters, then apply a mosaic filter to them.

by beloch 11y ago

It sounds like a useful tactic would be to plaster your walls with art related to Disney/Marvel characters. This would make it a legal nightmare to film in without stripping the place bare.

rl3 11y ago

Even better, mix in some QR code posters with illegitimate links to Marvel/Disney content. If even one somehow slips by the video editing crew, you're talking legal apocalypse.

anigbrowl 11y ago
No you're not. Scienter would apply.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- rl3 11y ago
  Sure, but it would still create a legal mess and/or a large headache.
  - ryanlol 11y ago
    No it wouldn't cause anything at all. Nobody sane would sue for that because they might as well be taking a pile of money and setting it on fire.
    - rl3 11y ago
      >Nobody sane would sue for that because they might as well be taking a pile of money and setting it on fire. In other words, basically what major copyright holders do every time they file lawsuits against P2P users en masse. Seems to me they're already adept at setting large piles of money on fire.
      - pessimizer 11y ago
        They only file those suits to get addresses, and use them to send out letters asking for cash not to sue. They usually don't sue anyone, and make a fortune.
        rl3 11y ago
        >They usually don't sue anyone, and make a fortune. Such practices do not appear profitable.[0] Perhaps that's because the article is dated, but mass P2P lawsuits being unprofitable is congruent with their decline in recent years. [0] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/10/music-industry-exec-p2p-litigation-is-a-money-pit/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/10/music-industry-ex...
      - ryanlol 11y ago
        Sorry, but what connection is there between the P2P lawsuits and suing someone from shooting porn in an apartment that just happens to have a barely readable QR code on the wall put there by someone else?
        rl3 11y ago
        You were suggesting major content holders are rational in regards to litigation. P2P lawsuits serve as a counterexample to that.
        ryanlol 11y ago
        Familiarize yourself with the bulk P2P lawsuits, they're doing everything in their power to cut costs.
        rl3 11y ago
        I'll get right on that, but first I have to bury this dead horse here.

Kristine1975 11y ago

>without stripping the place bare. Well they are shooting a porn movie, so why not try something new? It's boring if only the actresses/actors are stripping. "Hot poster action! Uncensored walls! Naughty wallpaper laid bare!" Or just pixelize. Japanese porn does it all the time. Maybe even automate the task: Use computer vision to detect copyrighted posters, then apply a mosaic filter to them.