4 ms·
I fail to see how it has "Done more damage to Apple...". Their bottom line seems to be unfazed. Their growth in the market was not affected.
by sigzero 11y ago
I fail to see how it has "Done more damage to Apple...". Their bottom line seems to be unfazed. Their growth in the market was not affected.
- bitmapbrother 11y agoThey submitted their patents for analysis by suing Samsung and quite a few of them have been ruled invalid due to prior art in both the US and EU. Not to mention the case has also exposed quite a bit of internal information about Apple.
- kobayashi 11y agoWhat information is that?
- bitmapbrother 11y agohttp://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443687504577567421840745452 http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100008723963904436875045775674...
- kuschku 11y ago> Their growth in the market was not affected. Apple went from 11% to 10% market share from Q42014 to Q42015. Android is the only one of the top 3 mobile manufacturers to have sold more devices than have become inactive in that timespan.
- jsjohnst 11y agoYou say that as if "Android" was the name of a mobile manufacturer.
- kuschku 11y agoI was just on the way back from an 8h project at uni, already falling asleep in the bus xD Sorry. Meant mobile system.
- dba7dba 11y agoAnd strangely enough samsung is the only android maker still making money.
- bitmapbrother 11y agoHuawei made money. LG made money. Xiaomi made money. Lenovo made money.
- dba7dba 11y agoI said 'still' making money as of now. Ref: http://www.wired.com/2015/07/apple-doesnt-sell-phones-makes-money/ http://www.wired.com/2015/07/apple-doesnt-sell-phones-makes-...
- bitmapbrother 11y agoThis changes nothing from what I said.
- dba7dba 11y agoOk how about profitable?