> It's Twitter's platform; they can do whatever the fuck they want. What if the same company controlled Twitter, Facebook, and Google? And what if that company

> It's Twitter's platform; they can do whatever the fuck they want. What if the same company controlled Twitter, Facebook, and Google? And what if that company decided to subtly give more prominence to political views they liked and less to ones they disliked? They could probably decide an election by doing that. > If they wish to ban hate speech and apply strict disciplinary action to users who post such speech, more power to them. And if they choose to give less prominence to politicians who think big internet corporations should pay more tax, do you still think "more power to them"? Are you sure you want them to have that much power? Powrer corrupts. The more power an entity has, the more they will be corrupted by it, and abuse their power. That's why it is unwise to concentrate power in a few hands.