4 ms·

This article seems more than a little silly. They blew up a single tweet into an article about Apple's corporate strategy in relation to the FBI. What next? Ar

This article seems more than a little silly. They blew up a single tweet into an article about Apple's corporate strategy in relation to the FBI. What next? Are they going to dig through Apple employees' trash, looking for variations in the number of credit card offers? "Apple Employees Load up on Credit" "Investigators have uncovered a 10% uptick in the number of accepted credit card offers from key Apple employees. Speculation about Apple's poor recent performance seems validated by their own employees obtaining as much cheap credit as they can get before the inevitable catastrophe approaches. Leading VCs interviewed had this to say: 'We always recommend to our partners that they obtain credit during times of prosperity, so that they don't need to unnecessarily dilute their shares by raising money in a downturn. If you're profitable but don't need the money, it's a great time to at least seek a line of credit from your bank.' Apple representatives declined to comment on this article, possibly wishing to delay the bad news until the next shareholder meeting. Next up: Microsoft reallocates its purchases of employee free soda to 20% Coke / 80% Pepsi. But what are the impacts on its cloud computing business?"

trymas 11y ago
+1. the deal was on it's way probably way before FBI scandal started.
vostok 11y ago
> Microsoft reallocates its purchases of employee free soda to 20% Coke / 80% Pepsi. You joke, but I bet you could get a leading indicator if you looked at companies reallocating from European fizzy drinks to Coke/Pepsi.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
stygiansonic 11y ago
I know you joke about looking at credit card info, but it reminded me of this story[1] where fraud researchers at a credit card company (ab)used their access to credit card transactions of their customers in order to mine the data and perform fundamental research about various companies' retail performance. They then used this information to trade on the companies just before earning release, and made a lot of money. They were eventually caught by the SEC because their trading was deemed suspicious, i.e. their options bets always seemed to work out. 1. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-23/capital-one-fraud-researchers-may-also-have-done-some-fraud http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-23/capital-one...
- pmarreck 11y ago
  So basically, they did their homework and got penalized for it?
  - ikeboy 11y ago
    >Here, Bonan Huang and Nan Huang allegedly got the information from their employer, Capital One, which was supposed to have exclusive use of the -- hey, wait a minute, does that mean that Capital One was allowed to trade on this data for its own profit? Wouldn't that be amazing? Surely the answer is no: I assume that Capital One signed agreements with retailers (or rather, with Visa and MasterCard, which signed agreements with retailers) in which it promised not to disclose transaction data, or use it for nefarious purposes. Really anyone who used this data would be misappropriating it from, ultimately, Chipotle. Which gets to keep its sales data to itself. Except once a quarter when it releases that data and the stock jumps.
    - pmarreck 11y ago
      If I set up cameras with visual recognition software in front of a statistically significant number of Chipotle branches to count the number of customers and base pre-earnings security purchase decisions on that, have I committed fraud? What they did seems equivalent to that, in a way. I mean, that's basically a company idea right there, if someone hasn't already done that
      - ikeboy 11y ago
        It's not equivalent because the data was given to them under certain terms that preclude such uses.
      - michaelbuckbee 11y ago
        For a long time satellite imaging of things like WalMart parking lots (used a proxy for sales) have been a thing analysts and traders look at.
        11y ago
forgottenpass 11y ago
They blew up a single tweet into an article about Apple's corporate strategy in relation to the FBI. This sort of thing happens all the time from "news" blogs. You're just particularly keen to this one. The writer takes a smattering of fact, fits in into the existing narratives the news media is already telling themselves and bloviates until they have something to staple advertisement to. What next? Are they going to dig through Apple employees' trash Yes. News organizations that should know better pad their pages with exactly that. Constantly and forever. The trashcan is typically metaphorical, and the rank and file employees are boring.
sandworm101 11y ago
>>> "Investigators have uncovered a 10% uptick in the number of accepted credit card offers from key Apple employees. Speculation about Apple's poor recent performance seems validated by their own employees obtaining as much cheap credit as they can get before the inevitable catastrophe approaches. That is exactly the sort of thing that investors might look for. The personal behavior of executive is very telling. It is more so for privately-held corps, but can be applied to apple. Seeing an exec liquidating assets or taking on apparently unnecessary dept can speak to that execs future plans, which are tied to corporate moves. Some investors watch family members. A wife/mistress/girlfriend/husband shopping for a new house out of town may be the sign that the exec is about to leave one firm for another. How they plan to finance the purchase also counts. One big tell, especially with startups, is communications with particular immigration lawyers. Execs facing a windfall often want to abandon their US citizenship in favor of somewhere with better tax treatment. See Saverin at facebook. So any communication with lawyers specializing in this process is a good sign of a buyout in the works. Either that, or they plan on winning the lottery in the coming months. You have to finish the process before you win the money.

trymas 11y ago

+1. the deal was on it's way probably way before FBI scandal started.

vostok 11y ago

> Microsoft reallocates its purchases of employee free soda to 20% Coke / 80% Pepsi. You joke, but I bet you could get a leading indicator if you looked at companies reallocating from European fizzy drinks to Coke/Pepsi.

deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

stygiansonic 11y ago

I know you joke about looking at credit card info, but it reminded me of this story[1] where fraud researchers at a credit card company (ab)used their access to credit card transactions of their customers in order to mine the data and perform fundamental research about various companies' retail performance. They then used this information to trade on the companies just before earning release, and made a lot of money. They were eventually caught by the SEC because their trading was deemed suspicious, i.e. their options bets always seemed to work out. 1. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-23/capital-one-fraud-researchers-may-also-have-done-some-fraud http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-23/capital-one...

pmarreck 11y ago
So basically, they did their homework and got penalized for it?
- ikeboy 11y ago
  >Here, Bonan Huang and Nan Huang allegedly got the information from their employer, Capital One, which was supposed to have exclusive use of the -- hey, wait a minute, does that mean that Capital One was allowed to trade on this data for its own profit? Wouldn't that be amazing? Surely the answer is no: I assume that Capital One signed agreements with retailers (or rather, with Visa and MasterCard, which signed agreements with retailers) in which it promised not to disclose transaction data, or use it for nefarious purposes. Really anyone who used this data would be misappropriating it from, ultimately, Chipotle. Which gets to keep its sales data to itself. Except once a quarter when it releases that data and the stock jumps.
  - pmarreck 11y ago
    If I set up cameras with visual recognition software in front of a statistically significant number of Chipotle branches to count the number of customers and base pre-earnings security purchase decisions on that, have I committed fraud? What they did seems equivalent to that, in a way. I mean, that's basically a company idea right there, if someone hasn't already done that
    - ikeboy 11y ago
      It's not equivalent because the data was given to them under certain terms that preclude such uses.
    - michaelbuckbee 11y ago
      For a long time satellite imaging of things like WalMart parking lots (used a proxy for sales) have been a thing analysts and traders look at.
      - 11y ago

forgottenpass 11y ago

They blew up a single tweet into an article about Apple's corporate strategy in relation to the FBI. This sort of thing happens all the time from "news" blogs. You're just particularly keen to this one. The writer takes a smattering of fact, fits in into the existing narratives the news media is already telling themselves and bloviates until they have something to staple advertisement to. What next? Are they going to dig through Apple employees' trash Yes. News organizations that should know better pad their pages with exactly that. Constantly and forever. The trashcan is typically metaphorical, and the rank and file employees are boring.

sandworm101 11y ago

>>> "Investigators have uncovered a 10% uptick in the number of accepted credit card offers from key Apple employees. Speculation about Apple's poor recent performance seems validated by their own employees obtaining as much cheap credit as they can get before the inevitable catastrophe approaches. That is exactly the sort of thing that investors might look for. The personal behavior of executive is very telling. It is more so for privately-held corps, but can be applied to apple. Seeing an exec liquidating assets or taking on apparently unnecessary dept can speak to that execs future plans, which are tied to corporate moves. Some investors watch family members. A wife/mistress/girlfriend/husband shopping for a new house out of town may be the sign that the exec is about to leave one firm for another. How they plan to finance the purchase also counts. One big tell, especially with startups, is communications with particular immigration lawyers. Execs facing a windfall often want to abandon their US citizenship in favor of somewhere with better tax treatment. See Saverin at facebook. So any communication with lawyers specializing in this process is a good sign of a buyout in the works. Either that, or they plan on winning the lottery in the coming months. You have to finish the process before you win the money.