> Even if I believed there were an absolute "right" to security, I don't think it's Apple's job to enforce it. Well, do you not believe the First Ammendmant pr

> Even if I believed there were an absolute "right" to security, I don't think it's Apple's job to enforce it. Well, do you not believe the First Ammendmant protects against compelled speech? Because the FBI's argument here boils down to "we have the right to require people to cryptographically sign things against their will"