3 ms·
The distinction is that one has a clear legal definition in a court of law and one does not. The judge in this case has examined the case and found that Tor use
by eykanal 11y ago
The distinction is that one has a clear legal definition in a court of law and one does not. The judge in this case has examined the case and found that Tor users do not have the legal right to having any expectation of privacy. The fact that we use the term anonymous as a synonym for privacy in some cases has no bearing on the judges ruling.
- mattmanser 11y agoYour own link contains this: It's important to note that the expectation of privacy discussed here means something different than when it's used in connection with searches by persons acting on behalf of a city, state, or federal government. So how is it relevant? They clearly say the definition discussed is between private individuals, not the state and individuals.