> If you mean Lisp as a straightforward expression of "Lambda calculus, then I would agree. That's what I was talking about. The language, being programmable

> If you mean Lisp as a straightforward expression of "Lambda calculus, then I would agree. That's what I was talking about. The language, being programmable, especially with read macros, can be used to create a very syntactically full language, but at it's basic core level, there is really just '(', ')', '.' and symbols.