This is a bad title. The only point at which the post even talks about FRP is in the sentence "And are there practical reasons that a library based on the CSP l

This is a bad title. The only point at which the post even talks about FRP is in the sentence "And are there practical reasons that a library based on the CSP language is useful in ways that, say, an FRP or functional reactive programming library is not?". Doesn't mention FRP after that, not even in part II.