2 ms·
The problem with software is that none have been 100% secure yet... I doubt that Apple will be able to achieve that in the near future. Someone should send a
by awqrre 11y ago
The problem with software is that none have been 100% secure yet... I doubt that Apple will be able to achieve that in the near future. Someone should send a phone to John Mcafee at the very least [1][2] ...
1. http://www.pcgamer.com/john-mcafee-on-his-fbi-iphone-hack-offer-our-government-is-illiterate-in-cybersecurity/ http://www.pcgamer.com/john-mcafee-on-his-fbi-iphone-hack-of...
2. http://arstechnica.com/staff/2016/02/mcafee-will-break-iphone-crypto-for-fbi-in-3-weeks-or-eat-shoe-on-live-tv/ http://arstechnica.com/staff/2016/02/mcafee-will-break-iphon...
edit: added source #2; see Google for additional sources...
- jjnoakes 11y agoWhat an awful article. And it isn't even the real article.
- mtgx 11y agoThis is why the FBI's argument and that of those who say "they just want balance" is such nonsense. "Balanced" compared to what? To the 80% insecurity we have now? And "balance" for what protocol? For all existing protocols? For all future protocols? What if hackers learn how to exploit that "balance" in a massive way? Will companies be allowed to fix it by improving the security or will they be "impeding law enforcement"? It's unbelievable to me how hard the government is fighting against basic security.