3 ms·
Most of what you say is reasonable and apparently historically accurate, but > the Commerce Clause was certainly, definitely, absolutely not understood by any
by jMyles 11y ago
Most of what you say is reasonable and apparently historically accurate, but
> the Commerce Clause
was certainly, definitely, absolutely not understood by any notable thinker at the time of the drafting of the constitution to mean what it has been interpreted to mean today (ie, Raich v. Ashcroft etc).
I think there is basically unanimity among legal scholars on this point.