2 ms·
First, thanks for replying, rather than simply downvoting. That isn't what the post says. The post says, literally: [Why Are So Many Animals Homosexual?] "Bec
by hartpuff 11y ago
First, thanks for replying, rather than simply downvoting.
That isn't what the post says. The post says, literally:
[Why Are So Many Animals Homosexual?] "Because some animals fuck anything that moves and doesn't".
Meaning homosexuality is a symptom, consequence or by-product of "fucking anything".
As to what you said:
> you can find any imaginable sexual behavior in the animal kingdom, and even what you would never imagine, don't project to animals human constructs.
If we can find any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) in the animal kingdom, how is any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) a "human construct"?
- acqq 11y ago> That isn't what the post says. No, literally, you've cherry picked the part, the post is much more nuanced: "Because some animals fuck anything that moves and doesn't, including dead animals[1] and other species[2]. Not sure if applying human categories such as "homosexual" to non-human animals is helpful, though." > If we can find any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) in the animal kingdom, how is any imaginable sexual behaviour (for example, homosexuality) a "human construct"? The behavior is of course not a human construct. Using animal behavior to prove any human practice is, because any practice can be supported that way. Just like the post you didn't quote fully also tries to suggest and exactly what I attempted to summarize, even if it can be better worded, for what I'm ready to apologize.