3 ms·
I'd add: * build a non-trivial and well-performing interpreter
by sanj 19y ago
I'd add:
* build a non-trivial and well-performing interpreter
- dfranke 19y agoDepending on how loosely you define well-performing, that probably entails my definition of a compiler.
- sanj 19y agoAgreed. But I was thinking more of dealing with the interesting runtime and caching issues that interpreters run into. You hit neat stuff like call overhead of the base language.