4 ms·

I find it hilarious that the author continued to use a term that is, by definition, only applicable to humans. I'd think if they were going to put so much time

I find it hilarious that the author continued to use a term that is, by definition, only applicable to humans. I'd think if they were going to put so much time into the article they'd at least have the presence of mind to use the correct terminology. Based on the wording used I'd say the author had an agenda.

mfoy_ 11y ago
It's "homo" as in "homogeneous" not "homo" as in "homo sapiens"... It's not only applicable to humans, by definition. It's applicable to anything that reproduces sexually.
- lsaferite 11y ago
  Fair enough, I'm an idiot sometimes. o_O