3 ms·
This is so painfully true. Sprints are organized to have very little time for technical debt and refactoring. From time to time there is a technical debt sprint
by vfc1 11y ago
This is so painfully true. Sprints are organized to have very little time for technical debt and refactoring. From time to time there is a technical debt sprint that addresses all the wrong issues.
But there is plenty of time to endlessly maintain crap code that should simply be rewritten. Plenty of hours to endlessly debug hard to debug code, for that time is not an issue. But to rewrite something that really needs to be rewritten, there is no budget for that.
In the end it takes much more time to maintain bad code than to rewrite it, the users have bad user experience and there are endless bugs.
Software factories are agile only in the view of agile consultants. This much process where developers are basically managed like assembly line workers is the antithesis of agile: agile should be about collaborating together to solve a problem with very little process: "Individuals and interactions over processes and tools"