Yes, too little ;-) Frankly, Rust just takes a few different approaches known since "forever" and promotes them to 1st class semantic citizens. Similarly Go ta

Yes, too little ;-) Frankly, Rust just takes a few different approaches known since "forever" and promotes them to 1st class semantic citizens. Similarly Go takes another set. Like every language in existence. So some things will be super easily expressible in one or another language, other things more obfuscated. Yet you could do the same in older ones, but perhaps more verbosely, with more syntactic sugar or boilerplate structures. Hence the comparison to a genetic algorithm with a few mutations in each generation. All a variation of the same set of mental constructs, possibly with very similar descriptive abilities (even when leaving Turing completeness out of the equation).