I don't think it's plausible that Tesla is responsable for it, but we can raise some questions surrounding the event. Apparently there's still no scientific co

I don't think it's plausible that Tesla is responsable for it, but we can raise some questions surrounding the event. Apparently there's still no scientific consensus (is that even possible?) on the Tunguska explosion and NASA seems to acknowledges that. Taken from: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30jun_tunguska/ http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30... "A century later some still debate the cause and come up with different scenarios that could have caused the explosion," said Yeomans" No remains of the asteroid, no impact crater and the claims from Tesla together is what is fascinating to me.