Worse, there doesn't seem to be a point. It sounds like a Haskeller's rant over how OOPers don't understand basic concepts. And, to be fair, a lot of them don'

Worse, there doesn't seem to be a point. It sounds like a Haskeller's rant over how OOPers don't understand basic concepts. And, to be fair, a lot of them don't, can't count how many times people have mistaken static typing for object-orientation. But this isn't the way to point that out. Should we be surprised that a modern multi-paradigmatic programming language can be used to code in a functional style?