4 ms·
Sadly, Telegram is barely what they claim. They're very good at marketing it as an open and secure messenger, but it really is not. Here is a brief summary: ht
by _jomo 11y ago
Sadly, Telegram is barely what they claim. They're very good at marketing it as an open and secure messenger, but it really is not.
Here is a brief summary: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10639688 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10639688
I assume the HN folks are already aware of the crypto-wise downsides of Telegram.
- the_mitsuhiko 11y agoIt's the closest we have to a user friendly messenger that is not entirely closed. I call that a step in the right direction. No reason to throw out the baby with rhe bathwater.
- danieldisu 11y agoI don't use Telegram because of secure messaging, I use it because is clearly superior to WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, and so many people.
- sz4kerto 11y agoI'm using it because it's really cross-platform, works reliably on Linux, Windows Phone, web (these three are the most problematic when it comes to messengers). Also, it's extremely lightweight and fast.
- edcastro 11y agoIt's one of the few - if not the only - native, reliable and fast among all major platforms. It just works. Sure, there's the whole security debacle behind, but all in all, as an instant messenger, it works wonderfully.
- kozukumi 11y agoI use Telegram as a cross-platform alternative to SMS which offers zero security anyway so anything Telegram has is better than what I would get with SMS anyway.
- ValentineC 11y agoI agree. While I love Telegram's UI/UX and cross-platform functionality to bits, their user support is abysmal, and it feels like the community is evolving into something of a walled garden.