4 ms·
Great but no support for tables, I can't use it for now :( So I use CKEditor because it support everything the client want but it is like a trade with the devi
by hokkos 11y ago
Great but no support for tables, I can't use it for now :(
So I use CKEditor because it support everything the client want but it is like a trade with the devil. It is the worst js lib I ever had the displeasure to use, it made one developer never want to be on my project again.
I needed to fix its sources, and have the non uglyfied code load in my app to debug it, because they only distribute working minimised merged js, I had to make the full sources load in webpack : pack all the js and load de dependancies in order following a config js file. The code is full of ridiculous timeout making the code unfollowable. Never use CKEditor !
I will gladly switch once it support tables.
- swax 11y agoSame here. CKEditor is extremely feature rich. All other editors feel like demos compared to it. And my customers want/use most of the CKEditor features - embedding images, access to edit the source code, tables, pasting in from MS Word, special symbol lookup, etc.. etc..
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- fredck 11y agoWe really hope to change your opinion with what's coming on CKEditor [1] later this year ;) [1]: https://medium.com/content-uneditable/ckeditor-5-the-future-of-rich-text-editing-2b9300f9df2c https://medium.com/content-uneditable/ckeditor-5-the-future-...
- hokkos 11y agoThis absolutely looks great, the Web needs a feature rich "rich" text editor, with modern code, document model and ui separated from the core. A quick look at the code shows you use standard import/export, configurable import style for the ui part and this is great news. Good job :)