4 ms·

> predatory pricing I've always thought GitHub's pricing is awesome and very accessible. Can you explain?

• nazgob 11y ago
  It'ss quite bad for my company. We have to pay per repo and we like to create quite a lot of small libs and microservices. I'd like to have a option of per user payment.
  • dogweather 11y ago
    Ah hah, that's interesting. Yep, the per-repo metric does weigh more heavily on architectures based on smaller more granular projects.
  • tedmiston 11y ago
    Very similar here. My startup is 3 years old with ~10-15 developers, but we make many small repos -- about 150 in that amount of time. Even though it's not tons of code, GitHub's pricing breaks down horribly in this case. I think that that in the long run many startups will move to embrace GitLab in the early days for price if nothing else.
• x1024 11y ago
  Suppose you are a web agency. Every single project for every single client should be version-controlled, right? But that tends to quickly add up when using GitHub - about a dollar per project per month. So, if my company finishes 30 projects per year, we'd be paying $360/year to GitHub for what is essentially "storing a backup". And if we do this every year, that's $1000/year within 3 years. Not to mention that for "Organizations" the prices are doubled. For some reason. So... $2000/year? Right now the same job is done by a $5/mo linode, with the prospects of upgrading to $10/mo.