7 ms·
So I just want to make sure I understand the criticism, as I feel we may have inadvertently drifted here: Someone who knows the risks (physical, emotional, men
by iamdave 11y ago
So I just want to make sure I understand the criticism, as I feel we may have inadvertently drifted here:
Someone who knows the risks (physical, emotional, mental what have you and furthermore etcetera) of a job shouldn't be afforded certain protections from the government to minimize those risks, if they take a job that opens them up to the possibility of said risks?
- SilasX 11y agoThey should be afforded those protections, but they should be waivable by informed parties (barring some dynamic that would explain why this is a bad idea and which no one in the thread has articulated). Is there a reason to believe the drivers aren't informed of such tradeoffs or did not become informed very soon?