4 ms·
> Chances are, this happened at least once over the lifetime of the terrorists ownership of the phone - thus we can at least see who they are communicating with
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Chances are, this happened at least once over the lifetime of the terrorists ownership of the phone - thus we can at least see who they are communicating with, right?
Is that really acceptable to you? Maybe they accidentally screwed up once so it's OK to keep the private affairs of a dead terrorist secret for no good reason?
> Wouldn't that be a good starting point?
I would have thought the best starting point was unlocking the phone, given the owner is dead and committed horrific crimes.
- arrty88 11y agoI would start with anything available, dig deep, and never give up. Including breaking down the doors of anyone they texted or called.
- hahainternet 11y ago> Including breaking down the doors of anyone they texted or called. But not the service provider intentionally denying access to this vital information? What a bizarre twist of logic!
- spoondan 11y agoApple do not have the ability to unlock the phone. They have the ability to create a tool that could unlock any iPhone. That is not a starting point.
- hahainternet 11y agoTherefore they have the ability to unlock the phone. I mean I knew people defended Apple here but I didn't think they'd demand logic no longer works to satisfy that.