3 ms·
You could argue that grandparent's criticism was presented as the more objective 'poorly written', which suggests a lack of skill on the author's part. Whereas
by scottishfiction 11y ago
You could argue that grandparent's criticism was presented as the more objective 'poorly written', which suggests a lack of skill on the author's part. Whereas the parent seems to address the style of writing, which is more subjective and less demanding of citation.
- StavrosK 11y agoYes, but that doesn't seem like a very strong point. "I found the article poorly written" would likely also be equally objectionable.