3 ms·
> Secondly, they are mixing their own binary packages with binary packages from Debian and Ubuntu without rebuilding the latter. This creates something that we
by embik 11y ago
> Secondly, they are mixing their own binary packages with binary packages from Debian and Ubuntu without rebuilding the latter. This creates something that we in Debian call a "FrankenDebian" which results in system updates becoming unpredictable
This is interesting because Debian itself encourages derivative projects to use their binary packages[1]:
> For those derivatives that re-use Debian binary packages, add some source packages and modify some source packages, where possible we encourage them to use standard Debian mirrors and add a second repository containing only the source and binary packages that have been added or modified.
Or maybe they don't encourage that behaviour but still give guidelines in case you want your derivative to work that way? I'm not 100% sure.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines
- asb 11y agoI believe the problem is the mixing of Debian and Ubuntu binaries rather than the fact they're not recompiling everything. Ubuntu doesn't just take Debian and add a few extra packages - it's a complete recompile with package versions likely don't match any Debian release.
- embik 11y agoOh, Linux Mint mixes Debian and Ubuntu packages by default? I was under the impression that there is Linux Mint based on Ubuntu and Linux Mint Debian Edition based on Debian.
- tremon 11y agoYes. Linux Mint was based on Ubuntu but still would pull packages from Debian unstable. LMDE was based purely on Debian.