I'm against the FBI's actions here, but your argument against it doesn't make sense. Did the shooter take the phone with him when meeting with accomplices? If

I'm against the FBI's actions here, but your argument against it doesn't make sense. Did the shooter take the phone with him when meeting with accomplices? If so, perhaps there's GPS info on the phone. What are the gaps in standard behavior (i.e. phone turned off...). Are these times where the FBI should dig deeper to discover the actions of the shooter? The idea that bulk collection of metadata is objectionable is something we're seeing in civilized technical circles. Individual collection of the same is even worse.