I find the argument really odd. For eg: India's borders were drawn by the British in 1947. Is the British responsible for the staggering growth rate of India o

I find the argument really odd. For eg: India's borders were drawn by the British in 1947. Is the British responsible for the staggering growth rate of India or any success attributed to India since. Same thing with Saudi: US or any other country did what they did, I am sure taking into account their interests. Since both India and Saudi Arabia are sovereign nations, it is their actions that have either propped them up or otherwise.