4 ms·

nor should, pay a permanent price Correct. This is just a job. If she gave it her best and more and they fail, then that is just outside her hands. Edit. no o

nor should, pay a permanent price Correct. This is just a job. If she gave it her best and more and they fail, then that is just outside her hands. Edit. no one knows what the fuck it is Correct again. Apple:iPhone/Mobile. Google:Search. Microsoft:Windows/Software/PC. Facebook: Connection/Address Book. Wikipedia:Encyclopedia. Yahoo and Twitter, while very useful to millions, suffer the same problem.

vonklaus 11y ago
I actually thought/think a merger of twitter and yahoo would make sense, and I also said a while back they should have merged(square & twitter) but that is off topic. The thing about twitter is that it has 1/2 of the problems of yahoo, it is pretty well defined as a communication channel and more specifically it is a one to many broadcast channel. It doesn't know how to financially capture value. Twitter is pretty interesting in that the arbitrary SMS length of 140ish char is pretty interesting from a data standpoint as it ends up playing sort of like XML. Pretty much the way to use data online is that we use 1960s IBM doc authoring language, it got a few tags and some sugar in the late 80s/90s but in reality we add meta tags to meta tags and then read this data. Twitter, due to the char limit actually provides dynamic labels to realtime information flows in a way that is comprehensible programatically. e.g. <p>Some info</p> is not particularly helpful as the entire <article> and accompanying data needs to be parsed and looked at, and always varies from site to site. However: In #election2016, I voted for #Trump. Data labels can mirror trends in human readable form and computer processed form. So in the above example, from @example you could state: Public Opinion of Trump +1 @example is a complete moron. So it actually ends up playing like a paradigm shift from sql to nosql data in terms of data streams.
RHSeeger 11y ago
I don't agree with this sentiment. Rather, I'd say that she tried and failed, and that that failure was as much her fault as it was anyone else's. Saying it was "outside her hands" implies she did the best that was possible, not just the best that was possible for her. 1. She was worth less than they thought when they brought her in. They paid for someone they thought could solve their problems, and she could not. 2. She's worth more now than she was when they hired her, because she does have more experience (this point I agree on). This means, to me that she's worth somewhere between "what she was really worth when they hired her" and "that amount plus the value she gained by learning". Given the decisions I saw her make (no remote work, basically firing anyone that wanted to continue their remote work), I'd say she was worth a lot less than they thought she was when she started... and worth a lot less now, even with new experiences.

vonklaus 11y ago

I actually thought/think a merger of twitter and yahoo would make sense, and I also said a while back they should have merged(square & twitter) but that is off topic. The thing about twitter is that it has 1/2 of the problems of yahoo, it is pretty well defined as a communication channel and more specifically it is a one to many broadcast channel. It doesn't know how to financially capture value. Twitter is pretty interesting in that the arbitrary SMS length of 140ish char is pretty interesting from a data standpoint as it ends up playing sort of like XML. Pretty much the way to use data online is that we use 1960s IBM doc authoring language, it got a few tags and some sugar in the late 80s/90s but in reality we add meta tags to meta tags and then read this data. Twitter, due to the char limit actually provides dynamic labels to realtime information flows in a way that is comprehensible programatically. e.g. <p>Some info</p> is not particularly helpful as the entire <article> and accompanying data needs to be parsed and looked at, and always varies from site to site. However: In #election2016, I voted for #Trump. Data labels can mirror trends in human readable form and computer processed form. So in the above example, from @example you could state: Public Opinion of Trump +1 @example is a complete moron. So it actually ends up playing like a paradigm shift from sql to nosql data in terms of data streams.

RHSeeger 11y ago

I don't agree with this sentiment. Rather, I'd say that she tried and failed, and that that failure was as much her fault as it was anyone else's. Saying it was "outside her hands" implies she did the best that was possible, not just the best that was possible for her. 1. She was worth less than they thought when they brought her in. They paid for someone they thought could solve their problems, and she could not. 2. She's worth more now than she was when they hired her, because she does have more experience (this point I agree on). This means, to me that she's worth somewhere between "what she was really worth when they hired her" and "that amount plus the value she gained by learning". Given the decisions I saw her make (no remote work, basically firing anyone that wanted to continue their remote work), I'd say she was worth a lot less than they thought she was when she started... and worth a lot less now, even with new experiences.